Helping us to vote

Electoral Commission, thanks for illustrating my point about the clarity triplet! 

Here's what I notice in this letter.
 

Structure: 

  • BLUF in the title

  • Headings that help us get around the information

  • Only relevant information – this is short!


Language: 

  • 'Local elections' is used in the first sentence and defined in the second.

  • Crystal clear instructions

  • Conversational tone with contractions (it's, don't, you're, you'd)


Design:

  • Orange title and headings (wins points for contrast if not beauty!)

  • Limited bolding makes us look at the crucial details

  • Heeeeaps of space where nothing's written

Given everything they could have included, this is a powerful example of restraint. Well done, Electoral Commission!

Previous
Previous

‘They’ll be informed’ is not a clear writing goal

Next
Next

Natural, conversational language